想請問各大佬意見,
小弟用緊D750+24120 F4 vr+ 28 1.8
想upgrade支鏡
如果現在買2470 2.8G而唔買2470 2.8E VR是否好不智?
定係買支Tamron 2470 2.8VC(A007) keep住支24120算9數
有勞各位大佬
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者: Google [Bot] 和 41 位訪客
onioncake 寫: 想請問各大佬意見,
小弟用緊D750+24120 F4 vr+ 28 1.8
想upgrade支鏡
如果現在買2470 2.8G而唔買2470 2.8E VR是否好不智?
定係買支Tamron 2470 2.8VC(A009) keep住支24120算9數
有勞各位大佬
stallone 寫:第一代24-70唔好買咯,啲邊位散到暈
peterso 寫:onioncake 寫: 想請問各大佬意見,
小弟用緊D750+24120 F4 vr+ 28 1.8
想upgrade支鏡
如果現在買2470 2.8G而唔買2470 2.8E VR是否好不智?
定係買支Tamron 2470 2.8VC(A009) keep住支24120算9數
有勞各位大佬
24-70方便d, 24-70 VR 太大支同要 82 mm filter
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8E Conclusion: Disappointing DxOMark scores
With the original Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G version announced in 2007 and thus over 8 years old, an updated version for the Nikkor lineup was due. The 24-70mm f/2.8E’s new features are certainly welcome additions, particularly the inclusion of a four-stop VR system, which makes this popular zoom lens even more versatile.
But what seems to be a complete redesign of the optical system has made an already bulky lens even bigger and heavier, which is a serious consideration if you’re looking for an all-in-one lens to carry around a lot. At $2,397, it’s pretty expensive, too — in fact, $600 more than the original G-type version and a whopping $1,100 over the Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 Di VC USD third-party equivalent. Perhaps all of that could be forgiven if the new Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8E had raised the bar for optical performance, but as we’ve seen from its DxOMark scores, this disappointingly isn’t the case. Overall sharpness is down compared to its predecessor and slightly worse at the critical setting of f/2.8. While chromatic aberration has been improved slightly, it’s still far from good at the wider focal lengths.