
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者: 沒有註冊會員 和 0 位訪客
fr9508 寫:I am wondering on this too as some members said back surround should be Direct firing other than Dipole or Tripole so I have no surround or back surround yet but only the 3 pcs at front![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Raymond hing,do u know what is the proper distance for the back surrround to King seat?is it same as front?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Snoopy 寫:chowchow 寫:Snoopy 寫: 我有個好大疑問!
好多人都話套 7.1 (或 5.1) 如果係同一系列的 speakers, 效果會最好. 但我睇岩果套, side 同 back surround 都係 monopole.
咁如果我將兩對 surround 轉左個 dipole 或 tripole speakers, 要用其他牌子.
咁到底應該犧牲邊樣呢? 要同系列既連貫性, 定要多向反射既好效果呢?
我個廳因為係客飯廳成長形, 所以應該夠大, 可以安置皇帝位響中間, back surround 就響 10尺後既飯廳果面牆, 咁單用 monopole 又係咪會差好多?
呢樣野已經煩左一排, 攪到遲遲都未敢扑鎚買 speakers.
Front + center better to be the same brand
呢個一定! 即係果 4 隻 surround 唔使?
Snoopy 寫: Raymond, your last sketch is a 9.1, looks interesting. Would the mid-range Amp like 4308 support 9.1 set up?
Raymond Wan 寫:Eddie Ngan 寫: I perfer monopole
especially in HK, relatively not big listening area
Dip/Tri may make the soundstage a bit confused provided that the distance between each surround is too close
just my 2 cents
from a deaf
From plenty of the feedback from overseas users, they will choose:
(1) Musical Program --> Monopole
(2) Movie --> Dipole (or Tripole <-- exclusive M&K design only)
![]()
![]()
pin 寫:Raymond Wan 寫:Eddie Ngan 寫: I perfer monopole
especially in HK, relatively not big listening area
Dip/Tri may make the soundstage a bit confused provided that the distance between each surround is too close
just my 2 cents
from a deaf
From plenty of the feedback from overseas users, they will choose:
(1) Musical Program --> Monopole
(2) Movie --> Dipole (or Tripole <-- exclusive M&K design only)
![]()
![]()
I'll suggest for movie use monopole also
chhanthony 寫: Tripole(三極唔係三向喎)係唔係得M&K同B&W先有?
Raymond Wan 寫: The choice is depending the taste of individual.
Try them out to see which type or combination suits you best.
![]()
![]()
Raymond Wan 寫:fr9508 寫:I am wondering on this too as some members said back surround should be Direct firing other than Dipole or Tripole so I have no surround or back surround yet but only the 3 pcs at front![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Raymond hing,do u know what is the proper distance for the back surrround to King seat?is it same as front?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If you have walls on side & back, better use dipole or tripole surround for movie.
However, if you do not have the walls for reflection, then better use the monopole or tripole.
![]()
![]()
![]()
The placement of the back surround is usually at middle of the FL and C as well as between C and FR.
Anyway, if your AV Amp has the control on ASA (Advanced Speaker Array) for the back surround. You can set to match the placement.
![]()
![]()
Raymond Wan 寫:![]()
![]()
![]()
I have tried Monopole, Dipole & Tripole for my home system.
My home is symmetric rectangular with 4 equal side & back walls.
....
fr9508 寫:Raymond Wan 寫:fr9508 寫:I am wondering on this too as some members said back surround should be Direct firing other than Dipole or Tripole so I have no surround or back surround yet but only the 3 pcs at front![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Raymond hing,do u know what is the proper distance for the back surrround to King seat?is it same as front?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If you have walls on side & back, better use dipole or tripole surround for movie.
However, if you do not have the walls for reflection, then better use the monopole or tripole.
![]()
![]()
![]()
The placement of the back surround is usually at middle of the FL and C as well as between C and FR.
Anyway, if your AV Amp has the control on ASA (Advanced Speaker Array) for the back surround. You can set to match the placement.
![]()
![]()
thank you Raymond hing![]()
![]()
![]()
我就跟thx擺因為諗住mk s150有認正.衣加頭痕back surround放bin個位同埋用mug?米路就話用曬ss150但貴左d所以諗緊用低一級duck吾duck